Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

--- p:questions1 [2020/04/03 16:04] – [Question 4] cjj
+++ p:questions1 [2020/04/04 06:07] (current) – [Question 6] cjj
@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 </color>
 =====Question 5=====
-We can still try to follow our previous method, keeping the rank and shuffle only C(ij) within a small interval, similarly for mi.
+We can still try to follow our previous method, keeping the rank and shuffle only $C_{i,j}$ within a small interval, similarly for $m_i$.
 If we increase the size of the interval, then we will get to completely reshuffle. Then  we can check how sensitive  our result to the network.
+<color darkgreen>
+This should be OK. But, as above, we need to check the validity of resulting combination of $m_i$ and $C_{i,j}$.
+</color>
 =====Question 6=====
 In this Bialek's paper for 40 neurons, a statement is different from what I saw before:
@@ Line 75: / Line 80: @@
 TK
+<color darkgreen>
+I couldn't find a corresponding statement in the [[https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2017.10.027|78-neuron paper]], either.
+</color>