Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revision Previous revision Next revision | Previous revision | ||
| p:questions1 [2020/04/03 15:48] – [Question 3] cjj | p:questions1 [2020/04/04 06:07] (current) – [Question 6] cjj | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
| In the paper you quoted, they enlarge the system to 120 neurons by a quote in page 10 | In the paper you quoted, they enlarge the system to 120 neurons by a quote in page 10 | ||
| "We thus generated several synthetic networks of 120 neuons | "We thus generated several synthetic networks of 120 neuons | ||
| - | of hi and Cij observed experimentally." | + | of $m_i$ and $C_{i, |
| + | |||
| + | <color darkgreen> | ||
| + | I have attempted this. However, after the drawing, the Boltzmann learning that is performed to obtain $h_i$ and $J_{i,j}$ does not converge as well as the original system so I am leaving them running on the cluster. I will check the results after I am back in my office next week. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| + | |||
| + | <color darkgreen> | ||
| + | However, the fact that they are not converging well may be an indication that the generated $m_i$ and $C_{i,j}$ may not be fully valid since we only ensure its validity with spin pairs and not with higher order of spin combinations. When the values $m_i$ and $C_{i,j}$ are not valid, no solution of $h_i$ and $J_{i,j}$ can exactly reproduce $m_i$ and $C_{i,j}$ and there will be a none-zero minimum for the error. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| =====Question 5===== | =====Question 5===== | ||
| - | We can still try to follow our previous method, keeping the rank and shuffle only C(ij) within a small interval, similarly for mi. | + | We can still try to follow our previous method, keeping the rank and shuffle only $C_{i, |
| If we increase the size of the interval, then we will get to completely reshuffle. Then we can check how sensitive | If we increase the size of the interval, then we will get to completely reshuffle. Then we can check how sensitive | ||
| + | |||
| + | <color darkgreen> | ||
| + | This should be OK. But, as above, we need to check the validity of resulting combination of $m_i$ and $C_{i,j}$. | ||
| + | </ | ||
| =====Question 6===== | =====Question 6===== | ||
| In this Bialek' | In this Bialek' | ||
| Line 67: | Line 80: | ||
| TK | TK | ||
| + | <color darkgreen> | ||
| + | I couldn' | ||
| + | </ | ||